Rubric for evaluating online courses in Digital Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v16.iEspecial.2024.1323Keywords:
Professional Training, Telemedicine, Education, DistanceAbstract
Objective: Rubric tools can bring objectivity when evaluating online courses in the health area, in addition to contributing to improving the effectiveness of the educational proposal. This study describes the evaluation process of the Digital Health Professional Update Program courses based on a rubric instrument. Method: Study of implementation of the online course evaluation process, selection of the rubric instrument, determination of analysis variables, application of the rubric and evaluation report. Results: The Open SUNY Course Quality Review (OSCQR) rubric instrument allowed us to detail multiple aspects related to the courses, including their design, methodologies and student evaluation strategies, in addition to revealing the intrinsic quality of the content that makes up the courses and the limitations that deserve attention from the authors. Conclusions: The adoption of the OSCQR rubric brought security and objectivity to the evaluation of the courses and indicated opportunities to promote the development of professionals working in the area of Digital Health.
References
Ali S, Uppal MA, Gulliver SR. A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers. Inf Technol People. 1o de janeiro de 2018;31(1):156–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246
Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, Rigon G, Cereda D, Pecoraro V, et al. E-learning for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 21 de janeiro de 2018;1(1):CD011736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2
Dede C, Grotzer T, Kamarainen A, Metcalf S. Designing immersive authentic simulations that enhance motivation and learning. J Learn Sci Theory Res Pract. 2019;229–59.
Ferraz AP do CM, Belhot RV. Taxonomia de Bloom: revisão teórica e apresentação das adequações do instrumento para definição de objetivos instrucionais. Gest Produção. 2010;17:421–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2010000200015
Alturkistani A, Lam C, Foley K, Stenfors T, Blum ER, Van Velthoven MH, et al. Massive Open Online Course Evaluation Methods: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 27 de abril de 2020;22(4):e13851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/13851
Awidi IT, Paynter M, Vujosevic T. Facebook group in the learning design of a higher education course: An analysis of factors influencing positive learning experience for students. Comput Educ. 1o de fevereiro de 2019;129:106–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.018
Frydenberg J. Quality Standards in eLearning: A matrix of analysis. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn [Internet]. 1o de outubro de 2002 [citado 1o de maio de 2024];3(2). Disponível em: https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i2.109
Kirkpatrick J, Kirkpatrick W. Kirkpatrick 's Four Levels of Training Evaluation [Internet]. Alexandria VA: ATD Press; 2016 [citado 1o de maio de 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/product/kirkpatricks-four-levels-of-training-evaluation
Macedo KD da S, Acosta BS, Silva EB da, Souza NS de, Beck CLC, Silva KKD da. Metodologias ativas de aprendizagem: caminhos possíveis para inovação no ensino em saúde. Esc Anna Nery. 2 de julho de 2018;22(3):e20170435.
Rogers L, De Brún A, McAuliffe E. Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 29 de junho de 2020;20(1):591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05212-7
Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 16 de setembro de 2015;3(1):32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9
Brasil. Resolução CNS No 510/2016 [Internet]. 2016. Disponível em: https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2016/Reso510.pdf
SUNY. OSCQR – SUNY Online Course Quality Review Rubric [Internet]. 2024 [citado 1o de maio de 2024]. Disponível em: https://oscqr.suny.edu/
SUNY. SUNY Online Teaching [Internet]. 2024 [citado 2 de maio de 2024]. Disponível em: https://online.suny.edu/onlineteaching/
olc. Online Learning Consortium (OLC) - Enhancing Remote Learning [Internet]. 2024 [citado 2 de maio de 2024]. Disponível em: https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/
Baldwin S, Ching YH, Hsu YC. Online Course Design in Higher Education: A Review of National and Statewide Evaluation Instruments. TechTrends. 1o de janeiro de 2018;62(1):46–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0215-z
RNP. Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa - RNP [Internet]. 2024 [citado 1o de maio de 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.rnp.br/sobre/governanca/estatuto
Seaborn. Seaborn Heatmap Documentation [Internet]. 2024 [citado 1o de maio de 2024]. Disponível em: https://seaborn.pydata.org/generated/seaborn.heatmap.html
Wutoh R, Boren SA, Balas EA. eLearning: a review of Internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24(1):20–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340240105
Fontaine G, Cossette S, Maheu-Cadotte MA, Mailhot T, Deschênes MF, Mathieu-Dupuis G, et al. Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 28 de agosto de 2019;9(8):e025252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252
Aldowah H, Al-Samarraie H, Alzahrani AI, Alalwan N. Factors affecting student dropout in MOOCs: a cause and effect decision‐making model. J Comput High Educ. 1o de agosto de 2020;32(2):429–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09241-y
Stracke CM, Downes S, Conole G, Burgos D, Nascimbeni F. Are MOOCs Open Educational Resources? A literature review on history, definitions and typologies of OER and MOOCs. Open Prax. 31 de dezembro de 2019;11(4):331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1010
Stracke CM, Tan E. The Quality of Open Online Learning and Education: Towards a Quality Reference Framework for MOOCs. julho de 2018 [citado 5 de maio de 2024]; Disponível em: https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/549
Stracke CM, Trisolini G. A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs. Sustainability. 2021;13(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115817
Gilstad H, Skogen M, Toussaint P, Larsen CB, Faxvaag A. Negotiating scientific knowledge in the development of an eHealth MOOC. Educ Inf Technol. 1o de janeiro de 2023;28(1):13–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11107-3
Wilkinson L, Friendly M. The History of the Cluster Heat Map. Am Stat. 1o de maio de 2009;63(2):179–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/tas.2009.0033
Porta M, Paragarino V, Czerwonogora A, Enríquez C, Casnati A, Marrero C. Rediseñar la Universidad digital: aperturas Reflexivas. 15 de agosto de 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/dgtic.26832968e.2022.6.1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of a paper to Journal of Health Informatics is understood to imply that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and that the author(s) permission to publish his/her (their) article(s) in this Journal implies the exclusive authorization of the publishers to deal with all issues concerning the copyright therein. Upon the submission of an article, authors will be asked to sign a Copyright Notice. Acceptance of the agreement will ensure the widest possible dissemination of information. An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript and acceptance of the agreement.
