A 50-year bibliometric analysis of the interoperability research field

Authors

  • Jackson Silva Universidade de Pernambuco
  • Fagner Silva Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
  • Elyda Freitas Universidade de Pernambuco
  • Everton R. Silva Universidade de Pernambuco
  • Cynthia Vieira Faculdade do Belo Jardim
  • Vinicius Cardoso Garcia Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v16.iEspecial.2024.1379

Keywords:

Interoperability, Bibliographic Databases, Bibliometrics

Abstract

Interoperability, the coordinated operation of systems, is a complex concept with varying definitions. Objective: This study delves into the evolution of interoperability research over the past 50 years. Method: The method was the bibliometric metadata analysis. The analysis encompasses 21,431 publications. Results: The results indicate a significant contribution from computer science, engineering, and mathematics. Conclusions: The results suggest a high dispersion of research on interoperability by publications sources and areas of knowledge and a predominance of punctual solution proposals in different contexts where interoperability is just a feature, in opposition to conceptual research on interoperability.

Author Biographies

Jackson Silva, Universidade de Pernambuco

Prof. Msc., Campus Caruaru, Universidade de Pernambuco, Caruaru (PE), Brasil. 

Fagner Silva, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Doutorando, Centro de Informática, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife (PE), Brasil.

Elyda Freitas, Universidade de Pernambuco

Profa. Dra., Campus Caruaru, Universidade de Pernambuco, Caruaru (PE), Brasil.

Everton R. Silva, Universidade de Pernambuco

Graduando, Campus Caruaru, Universidade de Pernambuco, Caruaru (PE), Brasil.

Cynthia Vieira, Faculdade do Belo Jardim

Graduanda, Autarquia Educacional do Belo Jardim – Faculdade do Belo Jardim, Belo Jardim (PE)

Vinicius Cardoso Garcia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Prof. Dr., Centro de Informática, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife (PE), Brasil.

References

Thomas I, Nejmeh B. Definitions of tool integration for environments. IEEE Software. 1992;9(2):29-35. doi: 10.1109/52.120599.

Gürdür D, Asplund F. A systematic review to merge discourses: Interoperability, integration and cyber-physical systems. J Ind Inf Integr. 2018;9:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.12.001.

Naudet Y, Latour T, Guedria W, Chen D. Towards a systemic formalisation of interoperability. Comput Ind. 2010;61(2):176-85.

Diallo SY, Herencia-Zapana H, Padilla JJ, Tolk A. Understanding interoperability. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Emerging M&S Applications in Industry and Academia Symposium. 2011. p. 84-91.

Ford T, Colombi J, Graham S, Jacques D. Survey on interoperability measurement. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications Conference. 2007 Jun; Gold Coast, Australia. p. 67.

Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ Res Methods. 2015;18(3):429-72. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.

Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Informetr. 2011;5(1):146-66.

Marcos-Pablos S, García-Peñalvo FJ. Decision support tools for SLR search string construction. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’18). New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2018. p. 660-7.

Department of Education U.S. The classification of instructional programs. 2020.

Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11(4):959-75.

Bard GV. Spelling-error tolerant, order-independent pass-phrases via the Damerau-Levenshtein string-edit distance metric. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Symposium on ACSW Frontiers (ACSW ’07). AUS: Australian Computer Society, Inc.; 2007. p. 117-24.

Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Wash Acad Sci. 1926;16(12):317-23.

Panetto H. Towards a classification framework for interoperability of enterprise applications. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. 2007;20(8):727-40. doi: 10.1080/09511920600996419.

Mensh DR, Kite RS, Darby PH. The Quantification of Interoperability. Nav Eng J. 1989;101(3):251-9.

Ferreira DE, de Souza JM. Methodology for developing openehr archetypes: a narrative literature review. J Health Inform. 2023;15(2):53-9.

Martin BR. The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Res Policy. 2012;41(7):1219-39.

van Raan AFJ. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics. 1996;36(3):397-420.

Coombes PH, Nicholson JD. Business models and their relationship with marketing: A systematic literature review. Ind Mark Manag. 2013;42(5):656-64.

Published

2024-11-19

How to Cite

Silva, J., Silva, F., Freitas, E., Silva, E. R., Vieira, C., & Garcia, V. C. (2024). A 50-year bibliometric analysis of the interoperability research field. Journal of Health Informatics, 16(Especial). https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v16.iEspecial.2024.1379

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)